BJP's fake news fallout: Congress demands answers on USAID funding controversy

Amid the ongoing controversy over USAID funding, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has accused the BJP of spreading falsehoods regarding a $21 million grant, asserting that it was intended for Bangladesh, not India. This political spat highlights the tensions between the two parties as they navigate allegations of foreign interference in Indian democracy.

Congress Accuses BJP of Misinformation

In a recent statement, Jairam Ramesh labeled the BJP as a "procession of liars and illiterates," emphasizing that the news surrounding the $21 million funding for "voter turnout" in India was fabricated. He clarified that this funding, which was mentioned by former U.S. President Donald Trump, was actually allocated to support civic engagement in Bangladesh ahead of its elections. Ramesh's assertions come as the Congress party seeks to counter claims made by the BJP regarding foreign influence on Indian elections.

The Truth Behind the Funding

Ramesh explained that the funding in question was part of two USAID grants administered through the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS). He stated that the $21 million was designated for Bangladesh's "Amar Vote Amar" program, later renamed to "Nagorik Programme." He pointed out that no USAID-funded projects have been implemented in India since 2008, reinforcing his argument that the BJP's claims are unfounded.

BJP's Response and Accusations

In response to Ramesh's statements, BJP officials dismissed the Congress allegations, labeling Rahul Gandhi a "traitor" for purportedly collaborating with foreign entities to undermine India's interests. The BJP has maintained that the Congress party is attempting to divert attention from its own shortcomings by leveraging Trump's comments for political gain.

Calls for Accountability

Ramesh further criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar for their silence on Trump's remarks and other perceived insults from figures like Elon Musk. He questioned whether India's dignity has been compromised in pursuit of political favors, particularly concerning business tycoon Adani.

The Broader Implications

This controversy reflects broader concerns about foreign involvement in Indian politics and raises questions about how political narratives are shaped in an increasingly interconnected world. As both parties continue to exchange barbs, the implications for India's democratic processes remain significant.

Conclusion: A Political Firestorm

As this saga unfolds, it illustrates the complexities of international relations and domestic politics in India. With both sides entrenched in their positions, the public awaits clarity on these allegations and their potential impact on future generation