Five hours of questioning: Allahbadia, Chanchlani's ordeal over controversial youtube show
YouTubers Ranveer Allahbadia and Ashish Chanchlani appeared before the Maharashtra Cyber Cell to record their statements in connection with the controversy surrounding the YouTube show "India's Got Latent."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ea56/2ea562a8ecdb5c8c21653bec84c660226708024f" alt="Allahbadia, Chanchlani grilled for 5 hours by Maharashtra Cyber"
The controversy surrounding the YouTube show "India's Got Latent" has escalated, with YouTubers Ranveer Allahbadia and Ashish Chanchlani appearing before the Maharashtra Cyber Cell to address allegations of obscenity. The case has sparked widespread outrage and legal action, including FIRs and summons from the National
Commission for Women
Ranveer Allahbadia and Ashish Chanchlani recorded their statements at the Maharashtra Cyber Cell headquarters in Navi Mumbai. The summons were issued in connection with Allahbadia's controversial remarks on Samay Raina's show, which sparked nationwide outrage and led to multiple FIRs being filed against him. Allahbadia had previously skipped summonses, citing death threats, but eventually appeared to cooperate with the investigation.
#WATCH | Maharashtra: YouTubers Ashish Chanchlani and Ranveer Allahbadia leave from the Maharashtra Cyber Cell Headquarters in Navi Mumbai after recording their statements in connection with India's Got Latent case. pic.twitter.com/zpNIrz6XZK
— ANI (@ANI) February 24, 2025
Controversy and Legal Action
The controversy began when Allahbadia made inappropriate comments on "India's Got Latent," prompting severe backlash and legal action. The Supreme Court condemned his remarks as "dirty and perverted," while the National Commission for Women summoned him and other involved individuals for questioning. Despite issuing a public apology, Allahbadia faced continued criticism and legal scrutiny.
Public Reaction and Aftermath
The incident highlights the challenges of balancing free speech with social responsibility on public platforms. The removal of the show's episodes and the legal actions taken reflect the seriousness with which such content is viewed by authorities and the public alike. The case serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of making controversial statements in the public sphere.